Abiriba Raleigh Group
Broad Discussion
This web page contains a set of discussion sections that may be helpful in explaining how the project was established.
The latest grand push for Hybrid Vehicles and Electric Vehicles is well underway. One of the main stumbling blocks of
bringing this new technology to the battlefield has been the same obstacles as that of electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, petro-based motorized vehicles and muscle powered vehicles
vehicles: range. Technology is now squeezing a reasonable 225 mile to 320 mile range from electric, hybrid, and
petrol-base power resources depending upon cost, weight, and power options. A range of 250 miles begins to make tactical
planners comfortable with the next generation of light combat vehicles.
Add to the coming generations of weapons platform the advent of fire-and-forget or over-the-horizons munitions now available to today's infantry
tactical planners are beginning to see a shift in the role of the Speed Bump tactic. The infantryman's mission as a Speed Bump
has begun to shift from isolate immobile defensive positions to mobile swarming tank-killer sections operating in mutually
supportive offensive operations. This tactical mission begins to suggest coordinated battalion level offensive operations.
One Soldier's Story
In 1966-1967 while attending a junior college in Oklahoma I supported myself working after classes at the Ft Sill Post Exchange Branch in Snow Hall. I had an opportunity to visit the Snow Hall Library many times.
It was there that I read about hydrogen fuel cell propelled electric vehicles. The source of this discovery was a declassified study produced in the med-50's projecting how the US Army was likely to engage in war in 1975.
The study had a number of projections correct like fire-and-forget ordinance, laser guide ordinance, small caliber assault rifles, hydrogen fuel-cell propelled electric vehicles/rovers, large body troop/cargo transports,
ultra-light aircraft for troop transport. There were also a number of blind alleys down which the study wandered. The study missed the advent of semiconductors and the space race. Asymmetric warfare had no place in the
study's projections.
Subsequently, I was able to gain admission to West Point in 1968. In the early fall of 1971, the Mechanical Engineering
Department (LTC Radler or CPT Mlakar) "threw down" a design challenge. The challenge was to field an electric vehicle
for the 1972 Clean Air Car Race or more realistically, 1974. At that first meeting the team's Engineering Staff Advisor
informed the few cadets who responded that USMA would provide various resources such as a Jeep, batteries or a hydrogen
fuel cell, electric motors, and advisors from various engineering disciplines. There was a good deal of initial enthusiasm
going head-to-head with Cal Tech, MIT, and Wayne University.
More realistically the team thought it would be most likely that a competitive vehicle might be ready for the test track in the
1973-74 trimeframe. My participation waned as I proceeded toward June 7, 1972 graduation. Upon completion of officer basic
training, Airborne and Ranger training I began my tour of duty with the 82nd Airborne at Ft. Bragg, NC. While in that assignment
I was fortunate to serve under Hog-Jackson: Major Jackson, XO 1/508 BN 82 ABN. Major Jackson derived his radio call sign,
Hog, from his football days at Grambling State University. As one of Major Jackson's "speed bumps" I had the
opportunity to train at killing Ivan's tanks using a deep, reinforced spider hole and a M72 LAW
during the lock-down prompted by the Yom Kippur War (October 1973). The tactical concept at that time was to hide in the spider hole while
Ivan's tanks rolled over and passed. Once Ivan's tanks passed, its weakly armored rear quarter panels are exposed. That presented
a nearly ideal target. The tactical concept begins to fall apart when Ivan's tank is accompanied by Ivan's infantry. But that is what
preregistered friendly artillery is suppose to engage. Regardless of how many times I and my troops practice this tactic we
failed to have much confidence in it. We felt it was just another way to "get muddy" or worse. Our simulated Ivan tank
operators (NC National Guard) put on a special "grinding" show when they topped my spider hole. It was a real thrill, ha-ha-not.
Following the closure of my service obligation I pursued a career in the electronic and software industries. I retired in August 2017. A quick review of
my web site should reveal a broad spectrum of interest that I have been lucky enough to pursue. The re-entrance of "light" tactical
weapons platforms and fire-and-forget/over-the-horizon infantry munitions gave birth to the tactical inspiration of the Hog Jackson.
- Rapid movement on the battlefield.
- 250 plus mile combat range at "go t=0".
- EV weapons platform stealth operation.
- Incidental solar, incremental vehicle platform charging (20-40 mile charge per day possible depending on vendor platform qualified).
- Rechargeable where electrical power resources exists.
- Rechargeable between weapon platforms.
- Multiple anti-armor/aircraft/fortification munitions available offering fire-forget and over the horizon target engagement.
- Low per unit cost supporting destroy in-place rather than secondary recovery operations.
- Battalion radio net capable.
- Air-drop-able/Air-transportable.
- Sling-loadable.
- Favorable cost-benefit ratio.
- Multiple vendors of EV weapons platform and munitions.
- Vehicle operator, munitions, and gunner training suffices with basic driving skills and minimal range introduction firings.
- Tactical deployment can be in an array of options from isolate sections to company and battalion level swarms.
-
General Dynamics Abram tanks cost $9 to $10 million per copy.
A section of Abram tanks (2-3 tanks) cost approximately the same as a battalion of Hog Jackson vehicle platforms
(400 vehicles) according to proposed tactical employment on the battlefield.
Below are the shortcomings of the Hog Jackson Weapons Platform:
First Order Issue: Funding.
Second Order Issues: Not field tested in the Hog Jackson Weapons Platform role.
Second Order Issues: Off-road capability varies between three likely potential weapon platforms.
Second Choice: Compact Pickup. Total: 2290. Off Road: 150
Third Choice: Crossover Hybrid. Total: 2100. Off-Road: 60
Third Order Issues: EMI on the battlefield remains a large question needing testing.
The level of risk on the battle field is not known at this time.
Any Hog Jackson Weapons Platform vulnerability must be established during field testing.
Third Order Issues: Performance and range is heavily weight dependent.
The TO&E loadout of munitions is not known at this time.
The effective TO&E loadout of munitions must be established during field testing.
Detailed project cost, procurement plan, test/deployment plan, contacts, etc. are considered to be company proprietary information. Specifics will
be made available upon request and agreements of confidentiality with Abiriba_RG.
1> An engineering project has established the Best Solution and two alternatives (vehicle formats) for the role as the
Hog Jackson Weapons Platform.
2> Three Weapon Platform sources have identified, approached. and responded positively.
3> A phased test and deployment plan has been created.
4> Preliminary logistics agreements have been established to support a five year long-term version of the Hog Jackson.
5> Various US Senators have been informed of the Hog Jackson Project via public web portals.
6> An effort to acquire non-government funding for the initial test phase has begun.
6.1> The selected Hog Jackson Weapons Platform's manufacture, Aptera, has not been able to shoulder the
financial burden of providing any road-ready vehicles for "near destructive" field testing.
6.2> Without firm US government support, Abiriba_RG needs to assemble financial resources to enter
Aptera's Accelerator Program as high in the priority as possible.
6.3> The final option that Abiriba_RG holds is to "pass on" the Accelerator Program and wait
for delivery of the Launch Version already slotted in the schedule: 3Q2024-2025 (estimated).
6.4> Abiriba_RG has begun collecting a Pledges (1$=1Vote) pledges from participants. (Frozen since 06/27/2023)
6.5> Abiriba_RG has restarted its Angel/White-Knight Investor search.
(Revised 12/27/2024) Restart at a much more limited effort:
7> (As of 230721) Switch to designing a prototype 2-3K pound 4 (
Figure 1,
Figure 2), and 6 (
Figure 3,
Figure 4) wheeled
AWD vehicle more suitable for the Hog Jackson Weapons Platform, HehJay, role.
7.1> This vehicle would be designed to be either first or second in each Best Solution Criteria excluding Delivery.
7.1.1> (As of 230724) An exo-cage vehicle OEM agreed to placed "roll-out" version in their queue.
The roll-out version is a production Ariel Nomad less gas powertrain.
The roll-out version will provide a "proven" road ready/off-road hull.
This "body-hull" will shorten the prototype development cycle.
7.1.2> (As of 230710) An alternate source has been identified as a possible backup.
7.1.3> (As of 230717) Initiated Abiriba_RG internal design effort of HehJay exo-cage vehicle + caisson.
7.2> (As of 230724) Modify powertrain to improve Off Road robustness
7.2.2 Return to the proven
Lunar Rover Vehicle /
Rivian R1T Quad four protected motors
design for the Hog Jackson, HehJay.
7.2.2.1 Addresses the severe supply chain problem with Wheel Hub Motors.
7.2.2.2 Greatly improves road/off-road hazard abatement issues.
7.2.2.3 (230725)Actively began integration of powertrain with exo-cage HehJay vehicle.
7.2.2.4
(Upadted 12/24/2024)Feasibility of the
EV HehJay vehicle style vehicle
demonstrated (as reported 2019) by third party.
was a non-mil-spec rear wheel driven entity which
mated theAriel Nomad 1 with BorgWarner and
Casadia Motion EV components. As with the Aptera, Ariel
indicated the in-ability to support production needs.
7.2.2.5 (Upadted 12/24/2024)The push to HehJay II began earnest.
7.3> Explore the opportunity to leverage Abbottanp's extensive experience with "
drive by wire" as another possible
technology performance and weight saving facet of design.
7.3.1> Throttle by wire: Electronic speed pedal-throttle control.
7.3.2> Brake by wire Electronic brake system control.
7.3.3> Shift by wire: Electronic "forward/reverse" control.
7.3.4> Steer by wire: Electronic steering control.
7.3.5> Park by wire: Electronic parking brake system.
7.3.6> Lock by wire: Electronic user and unit level only lock-outs.
Status: HehJay Gallery
as of 12/27/2024 depicting:
Vehicle Maturing Process
Vehicle Performance Simulation
FreeCAD "Abiriba_RG gm_vehicle" Workbench Integration
FreeCAD "Abiriba Macro" Tooling Library Development
Now you know the status of the Hog Jackson Weapons Platform vehicle.
If you have not already, please "Click Thumbs Up/Down for Hog Jackson Solution".
Your Helpful Feedback would be welcomed.
NOTICE: This site was fabricated for best viewing using
Netscape 4.x, or a functionally
equivalent browser.
Please send comments or questions using e-mail, voice telephone at 919-846-7705. (Last update: December 27, 2024 tar)